GoodGNUs

One of the “watercooler conversations” at Talk About Local (see post below) was the legal action taken by Royal Mail to force ErnestMarples.com to take down its extremely useful site converting postcodes to geographical information.

This service being forced down has had a knock-on effect on all of the voluntary-sector projects that use it, like Job Centre Pro Plus and The Straight Choice (”Live Election Leaflet Monitoring”), removing functionality or disabling them entirely.

Have you paid to use that postcode?

Unless Lord Mandelson’s New Labour get the chamce to sell off Royal Mail before the next election, Royal Mail is a publicly-owned company. It may feel it has a duty to maximise revenue by charging huge sums for access to our postcodes (without which it refuses to deliver our letters), but joined up government thinking would suggest thatgiving free access allows web entrpreneurs to build an infrastructure & eco-system around postcode services that could not only lead to paying customers for more sophisticated premium Royal Mail postal code services, but create more wealth in the economy, and hence more taxes to prop up Royal Mail until it gets better (& less over-compensated) management.

At the very least they could make the data available under a freely-licensed arrangement for not-for-profits. Not ideal, but better than throwing solicitors at good citizens. Indeed, so outrageous is Royal Mail’s behaviour that even a Labour government minister is taking them to task for it, then again Tom Watson is an honourable exception amongst politicians, given his understanding of the digital world.

Oh, and why Ernest Marples? After the postmaster general behind postcodes.

And to see where we could be going with publicly-owned data, look across the Atlantic.

Postscript: There’s a petion up at the No. 10 petition site: “We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Encourage the Royal Mail to offer a free postcode database to non-profit and community websites.” & a Guardian article on the affair. Thanks to Aidan McGuire for pointing out the petition.

Alternatively, route around the problem, and help out at Free The Postcode, the user-genertaed postcode database.

The NHS pouring £12,000,000,000 into a failed IT system is a powerful reminder of what can go wrong with a project out of control. One to be borne in mind by those of us dealing with far smaller IT projects.
Yesterday I had to face up to my chosen technology solution (Plone) not being, in its current release, up to dealing with the current project in a timely manner. This involved admitting to myself that the slight changes to the project spec were more slight than I had accepted, in my optimistic, “it’ll-all-work-out-fine” frame of mind. It involved consulting with peers, to check that my own revised opinion was right this time at least. It involved consulting to agree on a better solution. Then it involved “the difficult phone call”.
Possibly it’s the thought of such a difficult conversation that prevented anybody in the management chain of projects, like the NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT), flagging up the mess that they were dealing with - and thus letting the juggernaut go on, dragging along an increasing budget while failing to reach a satisfactory result (with apologies for such a mixed metaphor).

Transparency

However, as I constantly emphasise in my classes on social media & accessible web for small Orgs, it’s important to face up to mistakes and problems and be open and honest about them. This transparency doesn’t sit easily with people brought up in a culture of public sector risk-aversion, where everything must always be a good result for tax-payers’ money. Nevertheless, in a world of connected webs of blogs, microblogs, and other social networks, transparency about mistakes is the only credible tactic.
So, client was phoned. Problem laid out. Solution suggested, discussed, decided upon - and now the project is back on track in a revised, slightly reduced, but ultimately more strongly achievable form. If only those holding the public purse strings were approached in this way, or even cared enough to keep track of where their projects were going.